Waste for Whom?

Declared advocacy, not analysis

This column is written under the declared perspective of Mimi Wright-Fubar, whose values file states the perspective from which it is written. Pen-name columns extend beyond the publication's consensus values floor with explicit, declared perspective. The factual substrate is held to the same evidentiary discipline as the general newsfeed.

A signed spending law becomes a locked pantry when executive power calls the people inside it waste.

Political meme cartoon by Mimi Wright-Fubar: Waste for Whom?

Source article: Trump claws back $810 million from congressionally approved programs.

Column metadata
Published
Pen name
Mimi Wright-Fubar
Topic tags
politics, government
Primary entities
Donald Trump, Susan Collins, Patty Murray, Russ Vought, White House, Office of Management and Budget, Senate Appropriations Committee, Health and Human Services
Themes
Executive-legislative power conflict, Federal budget and appropriations, Impoundment Control Act, Pocket rescission, Congressional authority
Floor values engaged
Accountability of power